Wednesday, February 10, 2010

Bizzy Bone Hair Skulls

'MORE' / We're coming

and Respect for the environment ', in my opinion, one of the pillars on which rests the conscience of those who want to ensure a decent future for themselves and subsequent generations. Obviously the environment and ', in turn, closely tied to politics in a more' tight. In a place where you do not play by the rules, where personal enrichment, or worse, to avoid AT ALL COSTS going to be put on trial, perhaps because 'it is well known NOT to be innocent, and other behaviors unfair that they are bringing Italy to fail more 'faster and more' serious Greece and Spain, it is very difficult to make the general interests and the environment.

Here we are, here we come! Now it is almost to the regional elections of 28 March. Our movement, the Movement is coming to 5 stars, is growing. Floor, slowly but surely. The caste is concerned ... we are already and he's right! We are dangerous to the caste, to profess the politics and the underworld. Enough of the condemned (100 among those definitively and those in first and second degree) and the accused in the Parliament and the Government beginning with the President of the Council defines a hero as a mafioso Mangano and his friend as a statista esule un politico corrotto e latitante come Craxi. Basta con i Presidenti regionali ILLEGALI, che si candidano per la quarta volta (la terza consecutiva), fregandosene della legge 165 del 2004 che vieta l'elezione di un presidente regionale per piĆ¹ di due volte consecutive. Basta con gli Scodinzolini che dicono al telegiornale che l'avvocato Mills corrotto, indovina da chi?, e' stato assolto, quando invece e' stato riconosciuto colpevole ma perscritto!
Basta, basta, basta!



Concludo indicandovi dei blog che vi suggerisco di seguire: uno non molto noto, ma che contiene spunti e riflessioni molto interessanti: blog , l'altro but among the most visited blog in the world that you know of course: http://www.beppegrillo.it/ . A visit a day keeps the caste of the way!

Monday, February 1, 2010

Dog Ate Sanitary Napkin

AGAINST NUCLEAR ENERGY SOURCES: WHO WINS ?










I hope to be able to stimulate your interest and curiosity 'with the challenge of photovoltaics published a few days ago. Let's pretend now many Italians start (actually 'in 2009 there' was already a boom) to install facilities to go-go. All these mini photovoltaic implanted, will help anything? Obviously, our government and all others interested in promoting nuclear power say it is not 'can only achieve energy independence with renewable sources. I refer you to the post below on 'Energy and on wind energy for any of the information in the most' down to this seemingly a comparison of renewable sources.

Now let's do the math for dummies:
  1. in Italy are now about 340000GWh (Gigawatt hour) of energy per year (source: Wikipedia ). This number represents all the energy consumed in Italy (including lost for the transport 20000GWh which amounts to approximately 6% of the total. Only to produce energy wasted in transporting nuclear power plants are about 3!)
  2. how many rooftops are there in Italy? Let's say at least 15 million of houses, warehouses etc.
  3. admit that only 30% of the roofs can be used for various reasons (not 'property' of those who live, not 'correctly exposed oe' shady etc. Etc..) This means that there are about 4.5 million roofs "papabili"
  4. surface average user of any roof exceeds 60 square
  5. panels with current 8mq need to get a peak power of 1kW. This means that every roof 'average' can have an installed capacity of about 7.5Kwp that in a year generates an average 8000KWh
  6. energy potentials if the 30% of available roof and installing an 'then equal 36000GWh energy equal to about 6 nuclear power plants and more than 10% of national demand.
  7. do now count in another way. We start from the current situation: the GSE (Energy Services Manager) dichiara che ad oggi (ultimo aggiornamento 29 ottobre 2010) sono installati in Italia quasi 110 mila impianti fotovoltaici per una potenza di oltre 1700MWp. Questo vuol dire che tutti gli impianti attualmente in esercizio producono mediamente 2000 GWh all'anno pari allo 0.6% del fabbisogno netto. Quanti sono in percentuale i tetti attualmente utilizzati? Bhe direi praticamente 0.00% dei tetti disponibili. Immaginiamo di arrivare ad un Milione di impianti cioe' meno del 10% dei tetti disponibili. Questo ci farebbe passare dagli attuali 1700MWp dei 110000 impianti gia' installati a circa 13000MWp con una produzione media di oltre 15000GWh, pari a quasi il 5% dell'intero fabbisogno nazionale.
Questi due diversi calcoli (il former being more 'ambitious from the number of roofs potentially available, the other more' conservative starting from real data of existing production) lead to comparable results. And 'quite realistic to reach a domestic production to cover from 5% to 10% of national demand.

In all these accounts, we have not seen that over the roofs of houses and capannonni, you may install facilities on land.

I would like to complete the picture by adding some data available on the network on the production of energy from renewable sources :
  1. Hydroelectric 47000GWh 14.6% of the total requirement
  2. Wind 6700GWh
  3. 2.1% 0.6%
  4. Photovoltaics 2000GWh
  5. Biomass 6500GWh 2.0%
============== ========================
The total '62,200 GWh and that' 20% of total energy requirements.
We said before that only the PV could rise from 0.6% to 5%, wind could, according to estimates by some experts to arrive safely at 20000GWh in 2015, which would weighing 6%. Let the current stable biomass 2%.

These estimates then lead to the following values \u200b\u200bfor 2015:

Hydroelectric 47000GWh 14.6% of the total requirement
  1. Wind 20000GWh
  2. 6.2% 4.7%
  3. Photovoltaics 15000GWh
  4. Biomass 6500GWh 2.0%
The total energy from renewable sources could easily reach 27% of total needs.

you still believe that nuclear is the answer to energy needs? Until next time ...